Sign in Create account
For the forums that adjudicate disputes

Every dispute you handle has been
missing the third party.

The BBB, state AG offices, insurance carriers, payment networks, licensing boards, small-claims courts — every forum that resolves a consumer-services dispute works without a neutral, signed record of what actually happened. Authyr is that record. We never adjudicate anything; we only supply the evidence.

Court-admissible · cryptographically signed · tamper-evident

Complaint #BBB-44192

● Evidence attached

Resolution time: 14–21 days → 3–5 days

Signed at the source

Not reconstructed after the fact
N

Neutral third party

Neither side controls the record

You already know the problem.

When two parties disagree about what happened, you reconstruct the timeline from email chains, vendor logs the merchant controls, and human memory. The merchant’s records can be edited. The consumer’s screenshots are partial. Adjudication is slow because the evidence is bad — not because the process is.

Mutable

Merchant-side records

Timestamps can be changed, entries added later. Integrity rests on trusting whoever holds the system.

Partial

Consumer-side records

Screenshots and recollections, captured after something went wrong rather than while it was happening.

Absent

Neutral records

Nobody is signing anything at the moment of service. There is no disinterested party with a copy.

What changes for each forum.

Every forum below gains the same thing — a signed, immutable, third-party record created at the moment of service rather than assembled afterwards.

Better Business Bureau

~600,000 complaints a year

Today each complaint means reconstructing evidence from both sides by hand. Complaints with an Authyr record attached close in days rather than weeks.

14–21 days → 3–5 days

Insurance carriers

General liability, professional, E&O

Carriers want fewer claim losses. Verified businesses structurally produce fewer — a documented state of work before the incident, signed sign-offs, complete release chains. Premium discounts and a dedicated risk pool are the natural response.

Licensing boards

Medical, dental, legal, trades

Sanctions reviews and renewal audits currently mean document hunts. The Professional Attestation Ledger is a continuous compliance record, so audits become queries.

Small-claims & civil courts

Consumer disputes

Most of these are decided on weak documentary evidence. Signed receipts and ledger entries are third-party evidence — different in kind from screenshots and merchant logs.

Payment networks

Chargeback defence

A chargeback today pits an invoice against a claim. A signed, independently verifiable record of the transaction and the service changes what the network is actually weighing.

State AG offices

Consumer protection

Patterns of genuine harm are easier to distinguish from noise when the underlying records are signed at source and can’t have been edited afterwards.

How we’d work together.

Per-verification API

Institutional access to verify a receipt or a ledger chain on demand. Priced per verification.

Premium-discount programmes

For carriers: a defined discount for businesses maintaining verified coverage, with a dedicated risk pool.

Evidence-intake portals

For boards and networks: a direct intake path so a complaint arrives with its evidence already attached.

Authyr never adjudicates. We have no view on who is right — we only supply a record neither side could have altered.

Verification is independent of us. You check the signature yourself; you don’t have to trust Authyr any more than you trust the merchant.

Let’s talk about a pilot.

Enterprise contracts, revenue-share partnerships, and per-verification API access.